pike 님이 "코로나 바이러스 예방" 이란 제목으로 올린 글 팩트 첵
페이지 정보
큐조관련링크
본문
pike 님이 "코로나 바이러스 예방" 이란 제목으로 올린 글 진위
"존스홉킨스 감염학과 조교수의 엄마이며 의사인 "아이린 켄" 이 올린 글입니다."라고 시작하는 글에 대한 인터넷의 팩트 첵입니다.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/johns-hopkins-covid-summary/
팩트 첵: 출처가 불분명, 버젼이 중간에 바뀌었음.
But this content did not originate with Johns Hopkins, a spokesperson confirmed:
===> 존스 홉킨스 대변인으로부터 출처가 틀렸다고 확인 받았음.
This is not something produced by Johns Hopkins Medicine (JHM). We have seen rumors and misinformation about COVID-19 citing our experts and circulating on social media, and we have received several inquiries from the general public about these posts. We do not know their origin, and they lack credibility.
===> 출처를 모르겠고 신빙성이 결여됨.
The spokesperson also noted that people seeking verified information from Johns Hopkins University should check the university’s COVID-19 Resource Center.
===> 확인된 정보를 보려면 존스 홉킨스 대학의 COVID-19 Resource Center 를 찾아 볼 것.
We have not been able to definitively determine the origins of the list displayed above. Some iterations claim that this “excellent summary to avoid contagion” was sent out by Johns Hopkins University itself, but others involve a more convoluted attribution. For instance, some versions attribute the information to “Irene Ken,” an alleged physician, who received the information from her unnamed daughter, an assistant professor in infectious diseases at Johns Hopkins University.
===> 원본 출처에 다양한 설이 있고 확인은 못했다는 이야기
We also found versions that promote different advice. For instance, the Facebook post shown above from the “Gomes Football Club” claims that Listerine mouthwash can be used to fight COVID-19 (this is false). But this bad advice is not included in other versions of this message posted to Facebook. This indicates to us that the list evolved as it circulated on social media to include a hodgepodge of unverified advice.
===> 다른 조언을 가진 버젼들을 찾을 수 있었음. 페이스북의 “Gomes Football Club”에 올라온 버젼은 리스터린 마우스와시가 코로나바이러스를 물리칠 수 있다고 하였으나 이는 거짓임. 이 이야기는 다른 버젼에는 없었기 때문에 이 글은 확인되지 않은 조언들이 섞였다는 이야기.
Regardless of who penned the list, Johns Hopkins University told us such posts “lack credibility.” We won’t go through each point, but we did find a few items on this list to be factually inaccurate.
===> 일반적으로 이런 글들은 신빙성 결여로 더 취급 안한다는 학교측의 설명.
For starters, this list starts with the claim that COVID-19 is a protein molecule (DNA), but coronaviruses are RNA viruses which contain no DNA.
===> 글의 시작에 코로나바이러스가 단백질 분자 (DNA) 라고 하는데 코로나바이러스는 DNA를 포함하지 않는 RNA 바이러스임.
The list also claims that Listerine contains more alcohol than Vodka. This is not true. Most Listerine products contain 27% alcohol, resulting in an approximately 54-proof product. Vodka on the other hand typically contains 40% alcohol, which results in an 80-proof product. Neither of these items will effectively sanitize your hands. Soap should be your first choice, but the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) writes that if soap and water are not available, an alcohol-based sanitizer containing at least 60% alcohol (120 proof) can be used. Then wash with soap and water as soon as you can.
===> 리스터린이 보드카보다 알콜 함유량이 더 높다고 하는데 사실은 더 낮음. 어쨋든 둘 다 손을 효과적으로 소독할 수도 없음. CDC에 따르면 비누와 물이 최고. 하지만 그게 없을 경우에 최소 60% 알콜 (120 프루프) 가 함유된 세정제를 사용할 수는 있음. 그 후 가급적 빨리 손을 비누와 물로 다시 씻을 것.
This list also states COVID-19 needs “moisture to stay stable, and especially darkness. Therefore, dehumidified, dry, warm and bright environments will degrade it faster.” But this has not been definitively proven. Although there is still a lot to learn about this new strain of coronavirus, the World Health Organization states that “the COVID-19 virus can be transmitted in ALL AREAS, including areas with hot and humid weather.”
===> 코비드-19가 "어둡고 습한 장소에서 안정적"이며 따라서 "건조하고 따뜻하고 밝은 장소가 이의 소멸을 촉진"한다고 되어 있으나, 이는 확인된 사실이 아님. WHO는 "코비드-19 바이러스는 모든 장소에서 전염이 가능하며 이는 덥고 습한 기후지역을 포함한다"고 기술했음.
To sum up: This viral “advice” did not originate with Johns Hopkins University and the information contained within lacks credibility.
===> 요약: 존스 홉킨스 대학에서 유래되지 않았고 신빙성이 없는 내용이 포함되어 있음
Please keep yourself informed about COVID-19. If you have a question about the disease or a related matter, you can contact us here. You can also read previous Snopes fact checks about the coronavirus here. The websites of the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are also full of crucial information. Readers can also reference information that has been vetted by Johns Hopkins University using the university’s COVID-19 Resource Center.
"존스홉킨스 감염학과 조교수의 엄마이며 의사인 "아이린 켄" 이 올린 글입니다."라고 시작하는 글에 대한 인터넷의 팩트 첵입니다.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/johns-hopkins-covid-summary/
팩트 첵: 출처가 불분명, 버젼이 중간에 바뀌었음.
But this content did not originate with Johns Hopkins, a spokesperson confirmed:
===> 존스 홉킨스 대변인으로부터 출처가 틀렸다고 확인 받았음.
This is not something produced by Johns Hopkins Medicine (JHM). We have seen rumors and misinformation about COVID-19 citing our experts and circulating on social media, and we have received several inquiries from the general public about these posts. We do not know their origin, and they lack credibility.
===> 출처를 모르겠고 신빙성이 결여됨.
The spokesperson also noted that people seeking verified information from Johns Hopkins University should check the university’s COVID-19 Resource Center.
===> 확인된 정보를 보려면 존스 홉킨스 대학의 COVID-19 Resource Center 를 찾아 볼 것.
We have not been able to definitively determine the origins of the list displayed above. Some iterations claim that this “excellent summary to avoid contagion” was sent out by Johns Hopkins University itself, but others involve a more convoluted attribution. For instance, some versions attribute the information to “Irene Ken,” an alleged physician, who received the information from her unnamed daughter, an assistant professor in infectious diseases at Johns Hopkins University.
===> 원본 출처에 다양한 설이 있고 확인은 못했다는 이야기
We also found versions that promote different advice. For instance, the Facebook post shown above from the “Gomes Football Club” claims that Listerine mouthwash can be used to fight COVID-19 (this is false). But this bad advice is not included in other versions of this message posted to Facebook. This indicates to us that the list evolved as it circulated on social media to include a hodgepodge of unverified advice.
===> 다른 조언을 가진 버젼들을 찾을 수 있었음. 페이스북의 “Gomes Football Club”에 올라온 버젼은 리스터린 마우스와시가 코로나바이러스를 물리칠 수 있다고 하였으나 이는 거짓임. 이 이야기는 다른 버젼에는 없었기 때문에 이 글은 확인되지 않은 조언들이 섞였다는 이야기.
Regardless of who penned the list, Johns Hopkins University told us such posts “lack credibility.” We won’t go through each point, but we did find a few items on this list to be factually inaccurate.
===> 일반적으로 이런 글들은 신빙성 결여로 더 취급 안한다는 학교측의 설명.
For starters, this list starts with the claim that COVID-19 is a protein molecule (DNA), but coronaviruses are RNA viruses which contain no DNA.
===> 글의 시작에 코로나바이러스가 단백질 분자 (DNA) 라고 하는데 코로나바이러스는 DNA를 포함하지 않는 RNA 바이러스임.
The list also claims that Listerine contains more alcohol than Vodka. This is not true. Most Listerine products contain 27% alcohol, resulting in an approximately 54-proof product. Vodka on the other hand typically contains 40% alcohol, which results in an 80-proof product. Neither of these items will effectively sanitize your hands. Soap should be your first choice, but the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) writes that if soap and water are not available, an alcohol-based sanitizer containing at least 60% alcohol (120 proof) can be used. Then wash with soap and water as soon as you can.
===> 리스터린이 보드카보다 알콜 함유량이 더 높다고 하는데 사실은 더 낮음. 어쨋든 둘 다 손을 효과적으로 소독할 수도 없음. CDC에 따르면 비누와 물이 최고. 하지만 그게 없을 경우에 최소 60% 알콜 (120 프루프) 가 함유된 세정제를 사용할 수는 있음. 그 후 가급적 빨리 손을 비누와 물로 다시 씻을 것.
This list also states COVID-19 needs “moisture to stay stable, and especially darkness. Therefore, dehumidified, dry, warm and bright environments will degrade it faster.” But this has not been definitively proven. Although there is still a lot to learn about this new strain of coronavirus, the World Health Organization states that “the COVID-19 virus can be transmitted in ALL AREAS, including areas with hot and humid weather.”
===> 코비드-19가 "어둡고 습한 장소에서 안정적"이며 따라서 "건조하고 따뜻하고 밝은 장소가 이의 소멸을 촉진"한다고 되어 있으나, 이는 확인된 사실이 아님. WHO는 "코비드-19 바이러스는 모든 장소에서 전염이 가능하며 이는 덥고 습한 기후지역을 포함한다"고 기술했음.
To sum up: This viral “advice” did not originate with Johns Hopkins University and the information contained within lacks credibility.
===> 요약: 존스 홉킨스 대학에서 유래되지 않았고 신빙성이 없는 내용이 포함되어 있음
Please keep yourself informed about COVID-19. If you have a question about the disease or a related matter, you can contact us here. You can also read previous Snopes fact checks about the coronavirus here. The websites of the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are also full of crucial information. Readers can also reference information that has been vetted by Johns Hopkins University using the university’s COVID-19 Resource Center.
추천 0
작성일2020-03-31 20:38
장파이콜님의 댓글
장파이콜
허걱!!
조?
ㅋ ㅋ ㅋ
조?
ㅋ ㅋ ㅋ
